🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial law change that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.